UN: Solitary Confinement in the U.S. Can Be Torture, Force-Feeding Unacceptable

United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on Torture: Solitary Confinement in the United States Can Be TortureThe use of solitary confinement in California prisons can amount to “cruel punishment, even torture.” This is according to a recent news release from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), in which UN Special Rapporteur on torture Juan Méndez addresses the issue of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons and specifically those in California.

The statement came as nearly 100 people in three California state prisons were engaged in day 47 of a prison hunger strike. The hunger strike began on July 8, with more than 30,000 prisoners in two thirds of California prisons refusing food in protest of long-term segregation and inhumane conditions.

Méndez, who is a former political prisoner, asserts that prolonged solitary is cruel and inhumane, stating that even short periods in isolation often cause “mental and physical suffering or humiliation, amounting to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and if the resulting pain or sufferings are severe, solitary confinement even amounts to torture.”  

The UN rights expert urges the U.S. government to place restrictions on use solitary to ensure that the practice is “only imposed, if at all, in very exceptional circumstances, as a last resort, for as short a time as possible and with established safeguards in place.” 

Méndez further calls for an unconditional ban on solitary confinement of any length on children, people with disabilities, women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, and those serving life sentences or on death row.

Honing in on California’s continuing prison crisis, the UN expert expresses concern about about the brutal conditions at Pelican Bay State Prison, where “more than 400 prisoners have been held in solitary confinement for over a decade, and the average time a prisoner spends in solitary confinement is 7.5 years.” 

Of particular concern to Méndez are the approximately 4,000 people who are held in California’s Security Housing Units (SHU) on an indefinite or prolonged basis.

Pelican Bay Secure Housing Unit (SHU)

People held in SHU at Pelican Bay are isolated in 8 x 12-ft cells with no natural light and poor ventilation. (Photo: North Coast Journal)

Referring to a District Judge’s recent approval of California’s request to force-feed prisoners, the release quotes Méndez as stating that “it is not acceptable to use threats of forced feeding or other types of physical or psychological coercion against individuals who have opted for the extreme recourse of a hunger strike.”

Méndez has in the past repeatedly addressed the matter of segregation in U.S. prisons. The release specifically notes his 2011 report to the UN General Assembly and his “numerous communications to the Government” in which he calls on authorities to allow for an assessment of the country’s use of isolation by a UN expert.

Following up on Méndez’ efforts, a coalition of civil and human rights groups called on the U.S. government in June to extend the special rapporteur a formal invitation to assess the country’s use of solitary. To date, the U.S. government has said only that it is in the process of considering the request.

Concluding his recent statement, Méndez underscores his message to the U.S.:

It is about time to provide the opportunity for an in situ assessment of the conditions in U.S. prisons and detention facilities.”


Comments

  1. Bob says:

    “Referring to a District Judge’s recent approval of California’s request to force-feed prisoners, the torture expert states that “it is not acceptable to use threats of forced feeding or other types of physical or psychological coercion against individuals who have opted for the extreme recourse of a hunger strike.””
    ————————————————————————————–

    Forced feeding is not a threat. The state has a responsibility to ensure the prisoners don’t die from their hunger strike. Why? Because the prisoners have a responsibility to serve their sentence, they can not just simple choose to die because they don’t like the conditions. It’s the same reason someone with an impending execution is put on suicide watch.

  2. People says:

    Torture is not a part of the sentence. No judge ordered torture with the original sentencing. There is nothing they can do to escape this torture except for cdcr’s option for them to snitch on others. They do not “simple” [sic] choose to die, this is their only honorable and peaceful way to protest being tortured for years with no end (unless they snitch, become an informant).

  3. KAJAZYO R says:

    I find it strange how we are so keen on defending people who themselves did not see it normal to respect the rights of others by stealing, raping, robbing, even killing others. most of these guys confined committed these crimes. let them serve their sentences and not complain.treat them like humans but can not give them five star treatment. they are given very basic rights.

  4. Jette says:

    Those people don’t really want to die, but they are risking their lives only to draw attention to those horrible conditions. And the world must not look on and accept this. If actions are taken or even the USA can intervene in political situations in other countries like it is now probably about to happen once more. Then they should also allow others to critizise what they are doing to people in their own country. The death penalty, life without parole, solitary confinement are all atributes out of Middle Age and should be abolished!

  5. Adrian Masters says:

    Ah… in your opinion solitary confinement is a basic right…………

    I agree that these people have done things that brought them in prison, BUT they were sentenced to a prison confinement, not being excluded from the community they live, and especially and specifically not sentenced to be arbitrarily be confined to a de-humanizing treatment!
    Being put in solitary confinement for 1 year because you wrote a letter to your lawyer complaining/informing about the treatment by a guard who raped you is, in my opinion at least, not a matter of serving a sentence….. do you?

    And as to defending people who are incarcerated and have no means and or ways to safely defend themselves against brutality, arbitrarily treatment, and more worse things, I think that we, as teh People are responsible for those people, and their welfare, as justice to them is done in our name, by the judges and the juries, we are the ones who are in fact making the law, by giving that power to our representatives, but giving something in someone’s elses hand doesn’t mean having no responsibility for the outcome!

    My opinion!

  6. It should’nt matter what you’re incarcerated for. The state is’nt given the right to dehumanize another human for any reason. To isolate a person for indetermant time in the shu only makes one angry and mentally unsound for the rest of there lives.

  7. Tom Fontaine says:

    Attn: Urgent

    Injustice/Corruption

    This is a matter of Life and Death.

    This flier is being sent to all Washington DC Officials,
    State Legislators and Officials from all 50 States.
    along with News Medias and other Professionals:
    Journalists – Lawyers – Religions – Activists – etc.

    Please read..
    https://sites.google.com/site/thefactsofthebbostonbombing/tweets-8-18-13/cover-page

    Thank you

Leave a Reply