Senate Committee Invites Written Testimony on Solitary Confinement

As we noted last week, on June 19, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights, chaired by Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin, will hold the first-ever Congressional hearing on solitary confinement in U.S. prisons and jails. The subcommittee is inviting “interested advocates and experts” to submit written testimony to be included in the hearing record. This is a rare opportunity for those with an interest in this issue–including people with firsthand experience of solitary confinement, and their loved ones–to make their voices heard at the highest levels of government.

All those who wish to submit testimony need to do so by June 15 at 5 p.m. Statements should be emailed to Nicholas Deml at Nicholas_Deml@judiciary-dem.senate.gov. Statements should be less than ten pages. They are customarily addressed to the committee’s chair and ranking minority member–in this case, “Dear Chairman Durbin and Ranking Member Graham.” It is also advisable to begin by identifying yourself, your affiliation, and your connection to the issue of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons and jails.

Solitary Watch will be creating an archive of written testimony, accessible to all on the website. If you wish to be included, please send a copy of your statement to solitarywatchnews@gmail.com.

Comments

  1. Alan CYA # 65085 says:

    The mere fact that this hearing needs to be held is a perfect example of the growing gap between the classes. Because if you were to ask anyone in an underclass neighborhood if they know someone that is, or has been, in prison I bet the answer is “Hell yeah I do!” and then they would go on to tell you all their own horror stories.

    I can only hope that the members of this Senate committee have finally realized that there can be no top of the pyramid if there isn’t a solid base. The base has been shaken in this economic crisis and grown distrustful of all the country’s institutions. People now fear with good reason that the game has been rigged against them. No where is this distrust greater than in our prisons and nowhere in prison than in the SHU. But I fear many members of the Senate have still failed to catch on.

    However Justice Stevens recently warned that “a democracy cannot function effectively when its constituent members believe laws are being bought and sold.”

    If not only legislators but judges serve at the pleasure of lobbyists, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers. Law will be commerce. And money will be king. ♦

    Read more http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2012/06/18/120618crat_atlarge_lepore#ixzz1xUAKNkWB

    Not enough time was given for a poor writer like myself to share his experience. Probably for the best however since such frowned upon information now lives forever in the digital cloud.

  2. Alan CYA #65085 says:

    http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/05/joseph-stiglitz-the-price-on-inequality

    Joseph E. Stiglitz recently wrote in Vanity Fair: “In America, the chances of someone’s making it to the top, or even to the middle, from a place near the bottom are lower than in the countries of old Europe or in any other advanced industrial country.”

    And we can imagine what the odds were in old Europe after we read this view written by Antoine Fregier in 1840,

    “The poor and the vicious classes have been and will always be the most productive breeding ground of evildoers of all sorts; it is they whom we shall designate as the dangerous classes. For even when vice is not accompanied by perversity, by the very fact that it allies itself with poverty in the same person, he is an object of fear to society, he is dangerous.”

    I am sure that Fregier’s view has been held by many, if not most, elites long before his time and hence. After all this commonly shared view has helped justify the many forms of inhuman treatment inflicted on this “dangerous class” by a series of fearful oligarchies for over a millennium now.

    The SHU is just the latest and most diabolical technique of abuse. The system justifies the SHU by labeling those it holds in it as “the worst of the worst.” .So how did we ever do without it before? .

  3. Mr. & Mrs. Saul Levinson says:

    Solitary Confinement is torture – no other word will suffice. For a prison system to use solitary confinement in a country that claims that it condemns the use of torture in any form is to prove that that claim is a lie. This form of torture should be prohibited completely in our prisons and condemned internationally. We believe this deeply. Mr. & Mrs. Saul Levinson.

Leave a Reply