Jamie and Gladys Scott are two young women from rural Mississippi who were convicted, on questionable evidence, of involvement in an armed robbery that netted $11, and were sentenced to life in prison. Jamie Scott is suffering from end-stage renal disease, exacerbated by prison conditions and inadequate treatment–so her life sentence may soon become a death sentence.

We were among the first non-local media to write about the case of the Scott sisters, both here (and here) on Solitary Watch and for Mother Jones. Now the case in finally getting some national attention: The president of the NAACP, Ben Jealous, has called the sisters’ situation “utterly inhumane”; along with a growing number of grassroots supporters, he is urging Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour to consider a pardon or commutation of their sentence. Today, this same call was made by New York Times op-ed columnist Bob Herbert. After describing the Scotts’ conviction and sentence, he writes:

This is Mississippi we’re talking about, a place that in many ways has not advanced much beyond the Middle Ages.

The authorities did not even argue that the Scott sisters had committed the robbery. They were accused of luring two men into a trap, in which the men had their wallets taken by acquaintances of the sisters, one of whom had a shotgun.

It was a serious crime. But the case against the sisters was extremely shaky. In any event, even if they were guilty, the punishment is so wildly out of proportion to the offense that it should not be allowed to stand.

Three teenagers pleaded guilty to robbing the men. They ranged in age from 14 to 18. And in their initial statements to investigators, they did not implicate the Scott sisters.

But a plea deal was arranged in which the teens were required to swear that the women were involved, and two of the teens were obliged, as part of the deal, to testify against the sisters in court.

Howard Patrick, who was 14 at the time of the robbery, said that the pressure from the authorities to implicate the sisters began almost immediately. He testified, “They said if I didn’t participate with them, they would send me to Parchman and make me out a female.”

He was referring to Mississippi State Prison, which was once the notoriously violent Parchman prison farm. The lawyer questioning the boy said, “In other words, they would send you to Parchman and you would get raped, right?”

“Yes, sir,” the boy said. The teens were sentenced to eight years in prison each, and they were released after serving just two years.

This is a case that should be repugnant to anyone with the slightest interest in justice. The right thing to do at this point is to get the sisters out of prison as quickly as possible and ensure that Jamie gets proper medical treatment…

There was a range of possible sentences for the crime of armed robbery, but the state asked for—and received—two consecutive life sentences for the Scott sisters. In contrast, Edgar Ray Killen, the man convicted in 2005 of three counts of manslaughter in the 1964 deaths of civil rights workers Schwerner, Cheney, and Goodman, received a sentence of 20 years for each of the three deaths–under the same judge who presided over the trial of Jamie and Gladys Scott. Herbert continues:

I have no idea why the authorities were so dead set on implicating the Scott sisters in the crime and sending them away for life, while letting the teens who unquestionably committed the robbery get off with much lighter sentences.

Life sentences for robbery can only be imposed by juries in Mississippi, but it is extremely rare for that sentencing option to even be included in the instructions given to jurors. It’s fair to think, in other words, that there would have to be some extraordinary reason for prosecutors and the court to offer such a draconian possibility to a jury…

The reason for giving the jury the option of imposing life sentences in this case escapes me. Even the original prosecutor, Ken Turner, who is now retired and who believes the sisters were guilty, has said that he thinks it would be “appropriate” to offer them relief from their extreme sentences. He told The Clarion-Ledger in Jackson, Miss., “It was not a particularly egregious case.”

The appeals process for the women has long since been exhausted. It is up to Governor Barbour, who is considering petitions on the sisters’ behalf, to do the humane thing.

A pardon or commutation of sentence — some form of relief that would release Jamie and Gladys Scott from the hideous shackles of a lifetime in prison — is not just desirable, it’s absolutely essential.

Share

  • Joshlyn

    good for them glad to see they wining and being herd may they brake the darknes of justice

  • http://www.ourcommonground-talk.ning.com Janice Graham

    The more perplexing question is why it took so long to get any MSM attention to this atrocity !
    Here is a 2009 radio interview that may add to the discussion. At OUR COMMON GROUND we did a few interviews on the subject in 3009 and 2010. Our first was March, 2009. It just goes to show that no real news reporter exist in America.

    Here is our interview:

    http://ourcommongroundtalk.wordpress.com/about/our-common-ground-on-demand/ocg-3-04-09-the-wrongful-conviction-of-the-scott-sisters/

  • Prison Reform Movement

    Thank you for your continued & excellent coverage of this case!!

  • MICHAEL L PATTERSON

    THE PRESIDENT SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THIS CASE
    INVOLVING THE SCOTT SISTERS.
    I BELIVE IF HE GOT A FULL REPORT IT WOULD MAKE
    A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE FOR JAMIE AND GLAYDS.
    MICHAEL PATTERSON

  • laquanda

    I’m glad somebody took interest in these young women case because it don’t make no sense that the system failed to give them the proper justice that they deserve

  • Pingback: After 16 Years Behind Bars for a $11 Robbery, the Scott Sisters Will Be Free at Last « Solitary Watch()